Source: Public Interest Legal Foundation.
There can be no logical or practical justification for widespread reliance on voting by mail. A predictable number of lost/missing ballots is enough to override all other considerations.
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
Source: Public Interest Legal Foundation.
There can be no logical or practical justification for widespread reliance on voting by mail. A predictable number of lost/missing ballots is enough to override all other considerations.
I have mixed feelings about this order. My constitutional instincts are to:
At the same time I note that the states and Congress are dysfunctional to the point that federal leadership in the form of an Executive branch program could be useful. By this measure the order seems modest and pragmatic to me. Therefore I support it.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/us/protest-wrap-tuesday/index.html
Killings and shootings by “militia” and “bugaloo” bums.
Continue reading “Armed white militia groups are starting to kill people during protests”
According to this story, Iowa “is the sole remaining state that requires felons to apply individually to the governor’s office to have their voting rights restored.” McCauliffe tried to do that here, but the GOP sued and the Supreme Court overturned the EO. Was the law passed during the last session that changed things in VA?
I know I could probably look it up, but wanted to generate conversation as well as let my more learned brothers and sisters here fill me in.
While there has always been a touch of theater in being President of the United State, Mr. Trump has taken it to OBIE-level performances. (Google OBIE Awards if you don’t know what I am talking about).
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/07/coronavirus-banks-collapse/612247/
In 2007-08 it was CDO’S, banks and ratings companies. Now it is CLO’s, banks and ratings companies.
Continue reading “Here we go again: our rotten to the core financial system on the brink to screw us one more time.”
Proclivity has been assessed and used (New Hampshire, I recall) to deny, or terminate, employment of social workers. Methinks, that is now illegal.
Here is an article on the use in post-conviction criminal cases, but also in civil cases. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/the-sex-offender-test/397850/
I will look for specific cases of use in employment screening, but I know that at least one case in which, without an actual event, it resulted in a termination.
Additional reading, see Plethysmograph, this first reference specifically mentions its use in employment screening, albeit with legality caveat.
(1) https://www.nationalservice.gov/sites/default/files/resource/staff-screen-tool.pdf
(2) https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1480&context=wmjowl
The logic is flawless to some I suppose: If we just didn’t test for breast cancer, we could wipe out the disease.
Continue reading “Is this an “aha moment” about our virus testing?”
The writer sees echos of Sacco/Vanzetti in current events.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/politics/texas-has-shifted-to-an-its-your-responsibility-pandemic-plan/
Texas cases are rising rapidly as they “open” the economy. Public mask wearing has become a political, not a medical, issue.
Continue reading “Why do some feel they have the right to infect others?”