Tidewater News and Opinion Forum
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
The document is an affidavit that supports paragraph 14 in Sidney Powell’s election fraud complaint filed in Georgia. The unnamed expert explains how “agents acting on behalf of China and Iran” accessed Dominion software “in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”
The details are highly technical, but presumably easy to verify, since they are based on open source material.
You can’t say there is no evidence.
Source: SCRIBD.
The document is one of the affidavits filed with Sidney Powell’s election fraud complaint in Georgia. It establishes both the possibility and in the expert’s opinion the certainty of fraud.
You can’t say there is no evidence.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote on behalf of the appeals court. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
Biden has chosen John Kerry as his climate czar. Kerry has 6 houses, 12 luxury cars and SUV’s, 2 yachts and a private Jet. His job will be to tell us to forgo air conditioning and ride the bus to save the planet.
This does not surprise me in the least, but what is truly shocking is that Biden and his supporters do not even see the hypocrisy there.
Democrat politicians, when in power, do not see themselves as part of the people, but as anointed rulers, like Henry the 8th, sent by God to rule the people, not to live among them. It is that hubris that inevitably cuts short their time in power.
He should have chosen Ed Begley Jr. His climate views are wrong, but he at least lives as he advocates others do.
“An experienced attorney analyzes Sidney Powell’s legal filing in GA concerning the electoral fraud aided and abetted by GA politicians and election officials.”
The writer thinks the case has substantial merit.
You can’t say there is no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.
My expectation remains that Donald Trump will win this contest.
OK, let’s think about what to do about it if President Trump prevails in court?
I know many of you will reject the premise, but for the sake of examining what is right, assume that in one or more States, the expansion of mail in votes is shown to have been a violation of either the State or Federal Constitution and the results of the election cannot be certified. It then falls to the State legislature to choose the State’s electors. What is the right thing for them to do?
Somebody has to be Captain Obvious.
Maybe he should get the Nobel prize in medicine too
Rush a process to prevent her from ruling on the issue.
What are they afraid of?
