Redacted Declaration in Support of Paragraph 14

Source: Court Listener.

The document is an affidavit that supports paragraph 14 in Sidney Powell’s election fraud complaint filed in Georgia. The unnamed expert explains how “agents acting on behalf of China and Iran” accessed Dominion software “in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The details are highly technical, but presumably easy to verify, since they are based on open source material.

You can’t say there is no evidence.

Declaration of Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia

Source: SCRIBD.

The document is one of the affidavits filed with Sidney Powell’s election fraud complaint in Georgia. It establishes both the possibility and in the expert’s opinion the certainty of fraud.

You can’t say there is no evidence.

Even “Trump” judges see through the charade of the campaign to malign the election.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote on behalf of the appeals court. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Continue reading “Even “Trump” judges see through the charade of the campaign to malign the election.”

The Blindness of the Anointed

Biden has chosen John Kerry as his climate czar. Kerry has 6 houses, 12 luxury cars and SUV’s, 2 yachts and a private Jet. His job will be to tell us to forgo air conditioning and ride the bus to save the planet.

This does not surprise me in the least, but what is truly shocking is that Biden and his supporters do not even see the hypocrisy there.

Democrat politicians, when in power, do not see themselves as part of the people, but as anointed rulers, like Henry the 8th, sent by God to rule the people, not to live among them. It is that hubris that inevitably cuts short their time in power.

He should have chosen Ed Begley Jr. His climate views are wrong, but he at least lives as he advocates others do.


OK, let’s think about what to do about it if President Trump prevails in court?

I know many of you will reject the premise, but for the sake of examining what is right, assume that in one or more States, the expansion of mail in votes is shown to have been a violation of either the State or Federal Constitution and the results of the election cannot be certified.  It then falls to the State legislature to choose the State’s electors. What is the right thing for them to do?

Continue reading “Remedies?”