Freedom of religion versus Attempted Murder.

https://www.dailypress.com/government/virginia/dp-nw-coronavirus-doj-chincoteague-church-20200505-qky34epxlvg37bqbridggdftwm-story.html

One is tempted to say that whomsoever wants to risk their lives by gathering in the name of God should be allowed (dare I say, encouraged) to do so. But it is not that simple. Any one of the congregates could be a carrier. The larger the gathering it becomes more likely that the virus will be joining the worshipers. So, when it is over, all or some of the people attending could be infected as well. They then go home and about their business and before you can say Bob’s your uncle. more people get sick and more people die. Needless to say the current Theocratic DOJ has joined the defense of this dangerous, anti-social and unchristian behavior.

The defense says just look at all the people in Walmart. I think that misses the mark. Our bodies can only be fed with real food. Our spirits can be served alone or we can be connected to others by technology until the danger is past.

Of course, there are Freedom of Religion questions to address. One of them would be is not protecting religious gatherings a violation of the establishment clause? And what about the right to life of the people who IN PRACTICE not theory will be harmed if people can ignore the science and put others at serious risk?

Sour grapes or legitimate concerns?

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/496213-ousted-vaccine-chief-says-coronavirus-warnings-were-ignored

Refusing to do the political will of the administration cost Dr. Bright his position. Political will and cronyism in the time of pandemic. This is our President, America. Congratulations.

And the T-supporters are going to say it is just sour grapes for a demoted doctor. Pay attention to the truth and you will see clearly that he was removed because he would not toe the administration line. Politics and cronyism, thy name is Donald J. Trump and your “very best people”. Which round of those are we on now?