The link is a useful complement to the opening argument presented by the president’s defense team in the impeachment trial, and a bit easier to comment on than the video posted earlier, for anyone who feels they can refute the record in a competent way. But I actually want to comment on something else.
Continue reading “PJM: Ten Ways the Democrats’ Own Impeachment Witnesses Destroyed Their Case Against Trump”Setting the stage for a summary judgment
If you’re listening to the President’s response to the Democrat Managers case, get ready to hear “Ask yourself why you are only hearing this now” a lot.
Democrats poised to pass the lawyer’s full employment act
You do realize this is about creating an undefinable protected class which can then sue anybody for anything.
Why does it have to be called a war?
Once again, a conservative cries about trying to take the country back to the 1950’s, when “toilet paper” was a vulgar phrase.
The only “war” I see is the one where people expect others to the live the life they expect and not follow the teachings of their own savior; love and acceptance. Attack and tell people you don’t like to change and become the person you THINK you are. The mantra of the minority right.
Irony is lost on VA Beach Leaders
In a total blindness to irony, VA Beach is honoring a hero who died needlessly in a Gun Free Zone by naming another Gun Free Zone for him.
How polarization has changed America and our politics
Mr. Klein provides an enlightening view of how the parties have changed and in what way.
He makes some interesting points about why the Democrats will unlikely win the White House or the Senate. Disheartening for some, reason to gloat for others.
Schiff sums it up.
Adam Schiff brilliantly and emotionally sums up what is at stake. If you care about this country you will watch it and pay close attention.
Air cover for Republican Senators?
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trumps-senate-impeachment-trial-judge-andrew-napolitano
Judge Andrew Napolitano brings a dose of reality to Fox News and Washington Examiner fans. He completely obliterates the baloney that Trump defenders are peddling. He explains in plain language how Trump’s actions are not just impeachable. They are criminal offenses. In conclusion he writes . . .
“What is required for removal of the president? A demonstration of presidential commission of high crimes and misdemeanors, of which in Trump’s case the evidence is ample and uncontradicted.”
Red Flag and other Senate actions
Pilot on Red Flag and DeSteph bills
It could have been worse.
Rubin nails it again
Conservative columnist asks a telling question. How can GOP Senators possibly defend a vote to acquit when challenged by voters, hometown journalists or a tough opponent? A trial without witnesses is not a trial. It is a cover-up. The President’s defense team is offering nothing but complaints, whining, obvious lies and name-calling.
As she sums it up . . .
“In sum, the “nothing matters, just lie” mode of politics only applies within the Trump cult. As soon as you leave the bubble to encounter voters, the media or opponents who know better, your talking points make you sound dumb or corrupt or both.
That is what Republicans should contemplate: How the heck am I going to defend this to the people back home? Trump’s attorneys are giving them no fig leaves or explanations that can pass the laugh test.”