Source: Reason.

It’s not so much that markets work best, but that government controls so often work worst.

Source: American Thinker.

“From a legal perspective, Biden is an impostor, a false president, at least until December 14 of this year. If Biden can declare himself President-elect without any legal basis, then any other American citizen can also declare himself President-elect.”

Continue reading “The Founders Outsmarted the Presidential Election Fraudsters” →

Source: National Review.

Andrew McCarthy explains the Pennsylvania court decision. Like most of his peers at the predominantly never-Trump magazine, McCarthy discounts the potential for an ultimate Trump victory in the election.

Source: The New York Times.

The article, published in 2012, details some of the known problems with mail-in voting. I think it is interesting as an example of past wisdom that today is denied.

The practical mechanics of mail-in voting are interesting for Constitutional reasons, as well. For example, if it is known that mail-in ballots are twice as likely to be erroneous in some way, compared to in-person ballots, should not the states take extra measures to ensure the integrity of the mail-in vote is equal to that of the in-person vote?

Source: American Thinker.

You can’t say there is no evidence of election fraud.

Continue reading “Data analysis shows weird mail-in ballot anomalies in contested states” →

Source: PJ Media.

You can’t say there is no evidence of election fraud. The evidence in fact is accumulating and will be tested in formal proceedings, including courts of law.

Continue reading “Ronna McDaniel Presents 131 Affidavits, 2,800 Incident Reports of Alleged Voter Fraud in MI: Media Still Demands ‘Evidence’” →

Source: GNews.

You can’t say there is no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 presidential race. There is, in fact, statistical evidence to suggest that something unnatural occurred in various states and counties.

I think of it this way: Statistical anomalies are like probable cause. They are enough to warrant investigation, but not enough to establish guilt or innocence of a crime.

Source: National Review.

The alignment this election cycle of “big polling, big money, big tech, and big media” that Dr. Hanson describes is obvious. Not so obvious is whether these factions conspired to produce a Big Lie.

I believe they have, but to prove it is difficult. Maybe that will change in the weeks ahead.

Source: American Thinker.

The title of this piece is not to my liking (overwrought), but the summary of current allegations is useful. In principle there is nothing wrong with a contested election, so long as the resolution is transparent and the voters can agree that the final result is valid.

Source: Frontpage Mag.

That President Trump received expanded support among minorities this cycle is perhaps the most encouraging news to come out of this otherwise dreary election. One way to summarize it: Heterosexual white males lose power as a voting block. A better way to summarize it: Heterosexual white males who virtue signal on racial and ethnic politics begin to be ignored as irrelevant.