Skewing ETF investing to meet political goals instead of return to shareholders is a breach of fiduciary responsibility.
I’ll be checking on my ETFs to see if this foolishness is affecting them.
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
Skewing ETF investing to meet political goals instead of return to shareholders is a breach of fiduciary responsibility.
I’ll be checking on my ETFs to see if this foolishness is affecting them.
Is your issue that several massive firms effectively control what is supposed to be a free market, or that those firms are responding to consumer demand in a way you don’t personally like?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think that most ETF owners are unaware of the trend, but as they learn of it, investors will flee to profit driven management.
One of my favorite mutual funds is the VICE fund (VICEX) which invests in alcohol, tobacco, gambling and firearms. and my favorite individual stock is Rick’s Hospitality (RICK) which is a franchise of high end titty bars.
Virtue funds do not perform as well.
LikeLike
RE: “Skewing ETF investing to meet political goals instead of return to shareholders is a breach of fiduciary responsibility.”
That’s one way to put it, but I wonder if there is a more fundamental principle of economics in play. The returns on politically correct investments might be described as rents, but a rentier economy is not productive in an industrial sense.
LikeLike
“The returns on politically correct investments might be described as rents, but a rentier economy is not productive in an industrial sense.”
Could you elaborate on this? I think you may be on to something interesting but I don’t quite understand what you mean with the first part.
LikeLike
This may help:
https://infogalactic.com/info/Rent-seeking
There are a number of ways the returns on ESG investments might be described as rents:
An ESG investor with sufficient interest in a company can control the board of directors and force the company to serve the investor’s goals. The investor is like a landlord to whom the directors pay a “rent” of obedience.
An ESG investor might lobby for government regulations that harm his competitors more than himself.
Generally speaking, rents differ from profits in that rents redirect pre-existing wealth into the hands of the rentier, whereas profits derive from creating new wealth.
(I’m sure I’ve made a hash of this, but you can at least see my thinking.)
LikeLike
No I understand the distinction between rent and profit—it’s very important in left economics. I just wasn’t clear on how “woke funds” or whatever were rent seeking to a different degree than non-woke funds.
LikeLiked by 1 person