https://www.unz.com/article/the-intelligent-persons-guide-to-race-racial-differences/
A useful summary of current thinking.
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
https://www.unz.com/article/the-intelligent-persons-guide-to-race-racial-differences/
A useful summary of current thinking.
William Schokley is the man for you.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Why is that?
LikeLike
Ron Unz? I mean Ron Unz, every time I think someone can’t get any more on the fringe I see a post on this blog that makes INFOWARS look mainstream…
LikeLiked by 3 people
I take it you can’t answer the question.
LikeLike
LOL, You take almost everything incorrectly…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Here’s the part where he cries and pretends to be offended when he gets called racist for sharing an article about eugenics and phrenology.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Were the article really about eugenics and phrenology, I wouldn’t have shared it.
LikeLike
Right. Just the more socially acceptable forms of race science, like the 11-year-old truism about extra leg muscles or Charles Murray’s bell curve bullshit.
LikeLiked by 4 people
How is Murry’s Bell Curve, as he wrote it, not how the left portrays it, bullshit?
Are you saying his numbers are not correct?
LikeLike
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/07/why-is-charles-murray-odious
TL;DR: His numbers are sound, but he erroneously concludes that any discrepancy must simply be genetic. It’s bad social science. He’s either stupid or a racist.
LikeLiked by 4 people
RE: “His numbers are sound, but he erroneously concludes that any discrepancy must simply be genetic.”
You should read your own source. Beginning in the fifth paragraph with the words, “Let us be clear, then” your own source refutes your assessment of Murray’s work.
Various linkages between race, IQ and genetics are today widely accepted by mainstream science. Because popular discussion of these matters has not caught up with the established science is, in fact, one reason I shared the Unz article.
LikeLike
That was worded clumsily. What I meant was more like “he seems to begin with the premise that racism isn’t much of a confounding variable, and only makes reference to genetics or environment as possible causal variables.” Ignoring racism in a study like that is, to put it mildly, bullshit.
The reason popular discussion hasn’t “caught up” with those still doing race science is that most of us want to alleviate the effects of racism rather than trying to RetCon racism away as part of the conservative project.
LikeLiked by 4 people
RE: “The reason popular discussion hasn’t ‘caught up’ with those still doing race science is that most of us want to alleviate the effects of racism”
And yet, suppressing or denying valid science only perpetuates ignorance, which is a necessary precondition for racism itself.
LikeLike
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Jimmy
So what? If you have something to say, the burden is on you to say it. So far, you haven’t said anything.
LikeLike
Chimpanzees and gorillas have thin and narrow lips.
White people have thin and narrow lips, black people don’t.
Therefore white people are less evolved.
Perfectly sound observations. Conclusion? Maybe not so much. Maybe.
Now, as to the Bell Curve, since Liberals tend to run the colleges and universities, where does that put Conservatives?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Out actually creating wealth?
If you can’t do, teach.
LikeLike
@tabor FYI
“Those who can do, those who can’t teach” Is one of those oft quoted falsehoods voiced by those who are incapable of either.
As our universities become increasingly vocational, led by business and science, they also trend less liberal (although still left leaning by today’s standards due to higher general intelligence).
I can’t speak directly to the Sciences, but in Business schools the faculty typically do both teaching and wealth creation.
It’s almost impossible to effectively teach a practically applied vocation without having experience with it first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Finish it.
“Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach. Those who can’t teach, run for office.” (i.e., President)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Limited space?
And there are an infinite number of “can’ts” to mention if we’re going to describe the “donald”….
LikeLiked by 1 person
“worded clumsily“ perhaps.
However, that’s all that’s needed to distract and deflect from the actual point.
The cult has learned their lessons well, and facts and logic take a backseat.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This quote from the opening of the “caveats” section explains the entire piece quite well. “It is, however, somewhat simplified,”…
Simple thoughts from simple minds.
LikeLiked by 3 people
There is almost nothing that is “intelligent” or “useful” about this piece. That you seem to think so says quite a bit about you.
Heil Pepe!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Is there something in the article you would like to dispute?
LikeLike
Most of the racist points are made in this racist article by sins of omission. It is overall a racist simpleton’s oversimplified exposition of very complex matters.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Got it: There’s nothing in the article you dispute. You dispute the article for things not in it, which you also fail to specify.
A perfect example of insular reasoning.
LikeLike
Interesting.
Maryland: Fifth highest state in terms of % of African-Americans. Yet 18 other states have lower average IQ.
Delaware: #8 yet 22 states have a lower IQ.
Virginia: #9 yet 34 states have a lower IQ.
Conversely, Idaho has the 2nd lowest % of African-Americans, whereas they are only #22 on the IQ list. And Utah has the 7th lowest % of African-Americans, but sits at #24 on the IQ list. California is smack in the middle, and has the highest Asian % of population – yet is 3rd lowest on the IQ list.
https://www.inc.com/bill-murphy-jr/we-compared-average-iq-score-in-all-50-states-results-are-eye-opening.html
A much better correlation for IQ is between traditionally red states and traditionally blue states. Red states have the lower IQ, which is probably why they are red states.
LikeLiked by 5 people
What do you think your observations prove?
LikeLike
You’re living in the wrong state?
LikeLiked by 2 people
@Nancy
LMFAO
LikeLiked by 2 people
RE: “You’re living in the wrong state?”
I’m surely in the state of communicating with idiots if they believe that a correlation of IQ with state borders or political affiliation is scientifically meaningful.
LikeLike
It’s simple, “stupid white people” tend to congregate.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Some of the smart ones stay behind and start mega-churches….
LikeLiked by 3 people
Well John, I hope you weren’t expecting a reasonable response from our liberal brethren. Instead of refuting naturally existing differences with facts, the only retort is you’re racist. Remember the Va Beach police math exam was deemed racist by the same brethren.
LikeLike