So, periodically, Klaus Schwab and his sycophant billionaires gather together and decide how the little people ahould live.
This guy is just a white cat short of a Bond villain.
You will own nothing and be happy.
Published
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum 
LikeLike
Don’t have time for a 2 hour video, is there a summary?
LikeLike
I don’t know of one. In fact, transcription has been turned off inside the video.
However, the first 10 minutes feature Klaus Schwab. His remarks validate your assessment that he is one white cat away from being a Bond villain.
LikeLike
Paul Craig Roberts takes a dim view of the WEF:
“First, ask yourself how Klaus Schwab’s organization, WEF, and Rockefeller, Bill Gates, and Big Pharma’s organization, WHO, got the word “world” in their name. The only organization on a world level is the United Nations. As it name implies, it is an organization of independent nations. The nations speak, not the world, much less a private organization like the WEF and a privately funded organization like WHO.
“Globalists who speak in the name of the world have already pulled a fast one on us by appropriating a name that suggests that two private organizations speak for the world. Both of these organizations are in the process of acquiring this private authority over humanity.”
https://www.unz.com/proberts/the-world-economic-forum-the-world-health-organization-are-elevating-themselves-above-the-worlds-governments/
LikeLike
Apparently, PCR doesn’t realize that the WHO is “is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health”. A little more wood on the fire that UNZ Review is NOT a reliable source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization
As far as the WEF goes, we should pay attention to what they say, but be wary of what they do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You should read your own source more carefully: “United Nations Specialized Agencies are autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the co-ordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for co-ordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level.”
PCR is correct. WHO is an autonomous organization, not a governmental one.
LikeLike
“WHO is an autonomous organization, not a governmental one.”
The UN, then, is NOT a governmental one. IT is representative of governments of the member nations.
But to say WHO is autonomous is misleading.
LikeLike
And yet, your criticism of PCR and Unz is without merit.
LikeLike
My criticism is full of merit. You like the site and think it worthy. I throw the BS flag on it and have done so in the past and will do so in the future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
RE: “I throw the BS flag on it and have done so in the past and will do so in the future.”
Anybody can do that. Too bad you waste our time.
LikeLike
And YOU waste our time when you use UNZ and MOST of your other “dubious” sources.
LikeLike
You failed to show that Unz is dubious in this case. Besides, I endorse PCR’s commentary and see no reason to change, since no one has given one.
LikeLike
…”Unz is dubious in this case”…
Of course you do. You always do. No matter what evidence is presented, you deny that Unz is BS. It feeds your narrative and keeps you safe nad secure in your silo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm.
People who worry about malevolent, self-serving billionaires controlling the world AND are, at the same time, diehard Trump supporters. The cognitive dissonance must be tough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When did Trump try to control your choices?
LikeLike
“When did Trump try to control your choices?”
Your question is a symptom of the cognitive dissonance referred to. Billionaires are baaaaad but your favorite billionaire is not.
He did more to control the lives of others than any of the bad boys at Davos could even dream of. I refer to his success in denying reproductive freedom to tens of millions of women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You just can’t name anything then.
You know full well that abortion is about the unborn life and not the woman’s right.
LikeLike
“You know full well that abortion is about the unborn life and not the woman’s right.”
Obviously I know no such thing. The issue is about women’s most fundamental human right and your favorite billionaire took it from them. And the saddest part is he did it out of cynical self-interest, not any principle. He has none. But still you love him.
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-turns-evangelical-leaders-disloyalty-101301396.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
And therein lies the problem with massive wealth pooling among a relative handful of individuals.
It is true for the world just as it is for any sovereign nation.
For the same reason that ruling by familial inheritance, such as monarchies, is a bad idea, so is familial power obtained through massive wealth by its patriarchs/matriarchs.
Democratic representative systems are the best ways to control it when allowed to do so. Inheritance taxes were implemented to prevent dynasties from evolving during the late 1800’s and early 1900’s.
LikeLiked by 2 people