Supreme Court justices just love it when politicians seek cute dodges to avoid obeying the Constitution. They admire spunky disobedience to their rulings. This will be fun.
Does she really think that requiring submission of social media accounts for subjective review of character meets the ‘shall issue’ standard? Identity of past relationship partners?
A 6 month delay to appeal a rejection?
Labeling almost all public places ‘sensitive areas?’
This is political masochism. When this hits the courts, she should pray it gets blocked at the lowest possible court. If it gets to SCOTUS, you can bet they will be VERY specific about what they mean by ‘shall not be infringed.’