I am a former Chairman of the Tidewater Libertarian Party and was the 2007 LP candidate for the 14th district VA Senate. Previously, I was the Volunteer State Director for the FairTax. I am married 50 years with two grown children and 5 grandchildren.
View all posts by Don Tabor
Published
7 thoughts on “Speaking of indefensible”
You consider these partisan cherry-picked “polemics” posted on notoriously unreliable web sites “evidence.” That explains a lot.
Left out of all this “evidence” is just why the Obama “deep state” effectively scuttled Clinton’s campaign while providing cover for Trump’s. If they had been just as public with information from their Russia investigations as they were with Clinton’s emails, Trump would not be in the White House.
Neither you nor anyone else who pushes this “deep state” out-to-stop-Trump nonsense can explain why that is the case.
I will tell you that when you answer the question posed. Again, if the “deep state” was out to destroy Trump, why did it destroy Clinton instead and give Trump a pass until after the election? Without answer that makes sense it is not worth going through such “evidence.”
RE: “Neither you nor anyone else who pushes this ‘deep state’ out-to-stop-Trump nonsense can explain why that is the case.”
I have explained it many times: James Comey is a fool. He probably thought he was helping Clinton by exonerating her and by preventing the contents of Anthony Weiner’s laptop from becoming public. After all, his underlings had an “insurance policy” to fall back on if all else failed.
You consider these partisan cherry-picked “polemics” posted on notoriously unreliable web sites “evidence.” That explains a lot.
Left out of all this “evidence” is just why the Obama “deep state” effectively scuttled Clinton’s campaign while providing cover for Trump’s. If they had been just as public with information from their Russia investigations as they were with Clinton’s emails, Trump would not be in the White House.
Neither you nor anyone else who pushes this “deep state” out-to-stop-Trump nonsense can explain why that is the case.
LikeLiked by 3 people
wow, falling back on ad hominem that quick?
Where are the articles in error?
LikeLike
I will tell you that when you answer the question posed. Again, if the “deep state” was out to destroy Trump, why did it destroy Clinton instead and give Trump a pass until after the election? Without answer that makes sense it is not worth going through such “evidence.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Comey, knowing he was setting himself up for criminal prosecution, chickened out.
LikeLike
That is a joke, right?
Maybe Mr. Roberts can lecture you about the dangers of being a mind reader?
LikeLiked by 2 people
RE: “Neither you nor anyone else who pushes this ‘deep state’ out-to-stop-Trump nonsense can explain why that is the case.”
I have explained it many times: James Comey is a fool. He probably thought he was helping Clinton by exonerating her and by preventing the contents of Anthony Weiner’s laptop from becoming public. After all, his underlings had an “insurance policy” to fall back on if all else failed.
LikeLike
“He probably thought he was helping Clinton by exonerating her and by preventing the contents of Anthony Weiner’s laptop from becoming public.”
Talk about mind reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people