The writer presents the evidence for the proposition that the real events of the first millennium occurred within a time span of only 300 years. It appears that our historical record repeats in sequential order stories depicting the same events from different perspectives as though they were different occurrences, thus inflating the standard chronology by about 700 years. Archeology — especially the hard data of stratigraphy — may force revisions.
Science can be like that. Earth shaking.
“Science can be like that. Earth shaking.”
Too bad you see climate science differently.
LikeLike
RE: “Too bad you see climate science differently.”
I don’t, actually. What you refer to as “climate science” is comparable to the false history of the standard chronology.
LikeLike
Right. Denial that mankind is not contributing to the speed of change in our climate.
LikeLike
You have a very warped idea of what science is and how it works.
https://www.pilotonline.com/opinion/columns/article_9349fbc2-779d-5153-980e-93558a0b6b26.html
LikeLike
Or, something went wrong with the experiment, calibration error, noise, bread mold, cigar ash in the H2SO4 solution, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you really saying that if your theory fails testing by experiment, you stick with the theory and assume the experiment to be invalid?
You’d make a great mainstream climate scientist.
LikeLike
I’m saying that one experiment does not proof, one way or the other, make. Repeatability is the necessary component.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Posting your own opinion piece is supposed to be supportive of your argument?
I get it. You do not believe the science that the climate is being effected by man-made pollutants. Do you disagree that methane converts to CO2 and is one of the bigger drivers of climate change? Or so you deny it all?
Not that it matters. You tend to only believe in science that backs your pre-conceived notions. So it is actually you, good doctor who is warped.
LikeLike
You didn’t very carefully.
But if you want to argue the nature of science with Feynman’s ghost, go right ahead.
LikeLike
Feynman didn’t post the article you did. When you did, you took responsibility for it (while preperly crediting the originator).
The nature of science? I am more concerned with the science of nature, which we humans have tipped.
LikeLike
Feynman’s statement is the basis of the article.
The important thing to get is that authority does not overrule experience.
The CMIP-5 models the IPCC and the pre Trump NOAA and NASA relied on have been shown to exaggerate the effect of CO2 in an exponential manner, and the CMIP-6 models currently being tested aren’t doing much better.
A responsible scientist would simply admit they are wrong.
LikeLike
By 400 CE, the Catholic Church was established. By 500 CE, the Dark Ages began and ended with the millennium end.
LikeLiked by 1 person