The Hill: Ignore the hype — this is not an impeachment inquiry

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/464140-ignore-the-hype-this-is-not-an-impeachment-inquiry

“The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business.”

9 thoughts on “The Hill: Ignore the hype — this is not an impeachment inquiry

  1. Earlier comment; “I’d guess the reality is that the American Stinker et al have not provided sufficient conspiracy theory support to link to and parrot yet.”

    And now they have; parrot away….

    Liked by 1 person

  2. …”whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business”…

    With the complete and total stonewalling by the administration when it comes to normal oversight functions, whatever it is, it could end up very badly for the guy who claims LED light bulbs make him look orange. (obviously, he nor his advisers understand light color temperature)

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Bill Buckley is rolling over in his grave as a writer for HIS conservative magazine does his best Trumpkin impersonation. Makes me wonder what job Andrew McCarthy is auditioning for.

    Like

    1. Do you really expect to be taken seriously when you impune the character of a man soley because he writes for a magazine you don’t read (and which he didn’t even write for in the current instance)?

      This is a teachable moment, Mr. Green: What you should do here is take the trouble to grasp what is put in front of you. Then, if you don’t like it, you can tell us why. We might all learn something.

      Like

      1. In what way did I impune McCarthy’s character? By saying he is a Trump supporter and enabler? And you dare to assume I don’t read The National Review? You have made that accusation against me on numerous occasions. And he dose not matter wether he wrote the piece for NR. He is on staff there.

        Once again you have climbed upon your high horse to attempt to impune my character. Get off of it, sir. What you should do is take your demogogery and peddle it elsewhere. Your opinions are as much hooey as that which comes from the mouth of your hero in the Oval Office, to whom you appear to pay homage with every defense of his indefensible actions. You are worse than those who say nothing. You add conspiracy and gaslighting to almost everything you post. Amazing how a man who appears to have great intelligence is so gullible to believe that Trump can and has done no wrong.

        My previous comment, with a quote taken from the article, explains what I didn’t like about it. I added the other comment as an afterthought concerning McCarthy’s opinion. Maybe it is YOU who needs teaching.

        Like

        1. LMAO, and this comes from someone who believes in super secret dog whistles that mesmorize the masses? Oh please go back under the rock.

          Like

  4. So true but Democrats claim it is stalling to demand proper protocol. You know, no judge, no jury, just accusers with no real authority making wild demands and erecting a stake for their supposed victim.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s