Boy, would it be fun to have the climate alarmists testifying under oath in a court of law, unprotected by their Facebook and AP “fact checkers” and subject to perjury.
(Dream courtroom sequence)
“Do the CMIP-6 climate models accurately predict current temperatures when seeded with past measured data?” “Er, um, in a general sense in that they do not assert we are on fire, yes”
“Is the temperature record as recorded in the US for the last 100 years accurate, or was the 2009 revision the correct one, or was it the 2015 revision, or the 2018 revision?” “The 2018 revision is correct.”
“Why?” “Because it fits the models better than the actual measurements,”
“Why is that?” “Because we used the models to make the revisions.””
Yeah, it would be fun.