It seems the DOJ is not the personal law firm that the previous administration relied on. Brooks tried to say that his role at the 1/6 rally was official business and part of his job as a Congressman. Of course, after checking the Constitution, I could not find that inciting a violent attack on Congress was mentioned, but I’ll confirm. Maybe it is part of the establishment of a postal service as an earmark?
Sorry, Mo, but you can’t rely on the government to shoulder your personal problems. (Oh, the irony.)
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum 
Let the countersuits begin
LikeLike
“Let the countersuits begin”
That would be great. The more suits, the more people can be subpoenaed and deposed under oath about what they knew and what they did around the events of January 6th.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Let the countersuits begin”
And what exactly would those countersuits be about? Calling a representative out for dangerous rhetoric that helped fuel the attack on the Capitol?
Paul is spot on. Let’s get as many individual deposed as possible to get to the truth and who is responsible for what happened on January 6th. (Here’s a hint: It ain’t Nancy Pelosi.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is this really news or just what one would sadly expect from a hyperpartisan Biden DOJ just like the conclusion we all know has been written for the final report from the hag? Melodrama at its finest.
LikeLike
One note Johnny comes to mind.
You and Don have read the same article by Greg Jarrett evidently. The words are eerily similar.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Who is Johnny and who is Greg Jarrett? Try again, Sherlock. Truth hurts though…
LikeLike
The hag?
Every time I begin to forget the lower than low intellect of your basic Trump cultist you come along to remind me.
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The babbling, gaslighting insulter in chief pops up from the rabbit hole again. Rolling eyes…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Biden DOJ is following proper procedures; it is an independent LE agency with the leader appointed by the President. It is NOT the personal law firm for POTUS, as was the case during the previous administration.
Maybe you should learn a little more about our government (generally, not who is in office) before making an ass out of yourself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saw this morning that Mo Brooks, who felt so safe and secure preaching to the masses that day was wearing body armor.
If he was so protected, why didn’t he embrace the rioters, I mean tourists, when they stormed the building?
LikeLiked by 1 person
His suiting up with body armor is damning. He had foreknowledge of what was going to happen.
https://www.businessinsider.com/gop-lawmaker-mo-brooks-wore-body-armor-to-jan-6-trump-rally-2021-7
LikeLiked by 1 person
“ “I was warned on Monday” — January 4 — “that there might be risks associated with the next few days,” Brooks told the Slate politics writer Jim Newell.
“And as a consequence of those warnings, I did not go to my condo,” he added. “Instead, I slept on the floor of my office. And when I gave my speech at the Ellipse, I was wearing body armor.
“That’s why I was wearing that nice little windbreaker. To cover up the body armor.”
I am sure he passed on the tips he got to everyone else so they could prep better. 😇
It would be nice to find out who the tipsters were.
As Mo said on the stage, “it is time to kick ass and take names”.
We can start with this name: Mo. Larry and Curly will be next.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fourteenth Amendment Section 3.
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
This needs to be enforced.
LikeLiked by 2 people