Because it may be of some interest as a curiosity, I share a message from the Qanon forum below. It was written by Q himself, appeared Sunday morning , and is characteristic of Q’s messaging style.
With Q posts in general, there are two objectives a) reveal any hidden clues, and b) answer the questions in a way to produce a coherent message. It may take both to decipher the meaning of a post.
Some things to notice in this sample:
- There are 13 questions arranged into 8 logical groups.
- 12 of the questions end in question marks; one does not.
- 3 words are marked with asterisks: originally, knowing, Pops.
- 3 phrases are marked with brackets: ‘business partners’, contents unrestricted?, years of being treated poorly by ‘Pop’.
- There is only 1 declarative statement: Looks can be deceiving.
Here is Q’s post:
How do you inform your target(s) ['business partners'] what you have? Why would H. Biden have such material on his laptop? How was the content *originally* received? Email? Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?] On purpose [years of being treated poorly by 'Pop'] or simple negligence? If such information existed on laptop why wouldn't contents be claimed? Several attempts made to contact to claim? Messages left? Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim *knowing* the contents on the drive could bury *Pops* & family. A troubled life? A troubled family? Looks can be deceiving. Q
The way I read it, Q is suggesting that Hunter Biden engineered the email incident in its entirety, from preparing the content on the laptop through causing it to be discovered. Q doesn’t say why, but hints the incident may be some form of in-the-clear communication to ‘business partners’ or other associates.
Of course, since Q doesn’t actually say any of that in the message, knowing what the message says is actually impossible.
I expect to get grief for posting something related to Qanon, but if you’ve never seen a Q message before, you might wonder — based on this one — what all the fuss is about.