Bottom line, Special Agent John Huber is winding down the two year investigation into Hillary Clinton and Clinton Foundation corruption and come up with nothing. This is not a surprise to any thinking person. It was obvious from the get go that this was a real example of a partisan witch hunt and that it would come up with zilch. Trump has been doing what he wrongfully accused Obama of doing – using the law enforcement agencies for partisan purposes.
Yet another rabid right-winger conspiracy theory fantasy bites the dust.
Published
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum 
Can’t read the article as WaPo has a paywall.Found it at MSN.
OK, so a review didn’t lead to criminal charges, it was still improper for Clinton to keep public records on a private server under her control, whether it was prosecuteable or not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, but no “lock her up!” As expected. Next, Durham’s report will show nothing at the FBI or Justice Dept to indicate any criminal activity by the leadership during the Russia investigation. The IG already found there was ample evidence to open the investigation. More wasted tax dollars (wasn’t that one of the arguments about the Mueller investigation – $40 million) to prove, in THIS case, nothing to see here.
Now, is it OK for Mr. Trump to share intelligence information with the Russians, including sources and methods, but won’ tell the “Gang of 8”, at a minimum, concerning the intelligence that led to the drone strike on Solemani and the alleged “imminent threat”? Maybe not prosecutable but definitely improper?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Puts the Clintons in good standing… right alongside of the Mueller Investigation targets.
Oh no, wait, apples and oranges. There were violations, convictions and sentences meted out as a result of the Mueller probe, and the Clintons were not subject to the protection of a OLC opinion saving them from criminal indictment for obstruction of justice.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Improper?” Okay. Sure.
But, these “public records” consisted mainly of communications with other people in the government especially her staff and direct reports in the State Department and as such they were already kept on government systems when messages from them were sent to her or received from her. And, of course, we have different idea about what is “proper” with regard to email handling compared to the time in question.
LikeLiked by 2 people
After all of your HRC bashing and insistence that she was a corrupt individual that is a pathetic recognition that there was no there, there..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good for you, sir!
You made your point…while ignoring others.
LikeLike
Maybe you can explain what you mean? Ignoring others?
LikeLiked by 2 people
He can not, when facts come to light, the conspiracy crowd just finds another conspiracy.
A game of Wack a Mole is perpetuated…tiresome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My bad Craig, my comment was directed at Mr. Tabor’s weak reaction to the exoneration of HRC.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No problem, Sir.
LikeLiked by 2 people
During my brief time out, I’ll spare a few moments to reply.
Never mind…nothing I post will change your mind.
Enjoy your day, sirI
LikeLike