The GOP has a deeply held belief that it is improper to remove them from power simply because the majority of voters want them out.
Tidewater News and Opinion Forum
A place for civil discussion of the events of the day for Tidewater residents without the limitations imposed by media forums.
The GOP has a deeply held belief that it is improper to remove them from power simply because the majority of voters want them out.
First Slate says, “If Bevin can substantiate his charges, they would warrant a full and fair hearing. Bevin has also asked for a ‘recanvassing’ of votes, essentially just to make sure that the reported vote totals line up with the totals from voting machines. That is also a reasonable request to make.”
Then Slate concludes, “We may not live in ordinary times, but if the latter scenario comes to pass [i.e., Kentucky’s Legislature decides the election IAW applicable law], our democracy is in great trouble as we look ahead to 2020.”
The conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises. Slate is crying wolf.
LikeLike
How about you try to be more accurate in your “analysis”:
The conclusion is based on the second half of the next to last paragraph:
…” the Kentucky Legislature would have to abandon democratic values and allow the election loser to become the election winner,”…
Not crying wolf, but pointing put that this is a distinct possibility.
I admire your effort to obfuscate what the article said by pulling from a different portion and make it appear as if the conclusion had to do with your addition to the concluding paragraph. But once again, you have failed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
RE: “The conclusion is based on the second half of the next to last paragraph”
Not really. The Legislature is authorized under the state constitution to decide the election, as I noted. Slate admits that Bevin may be able to substantiate his claims, but assumes that he won’t. Slate then admits it is unlikely the Legislature will usurp the power of the voters, but assumes the legislature will make Bevin the winner, anyway.
Slate’s reasoning is illogical from top to bottom.
LikeLike
Yes, really. You are too obtuse to notice that you cherry picked from one part of the piece and inserted where it was NOT referred to. I caught you and you won’t admit it….again!
LikeLiked by 2 people
One word: Scary.
Mr. Hasen’s piece sent chills up my spine. It brings to mind the possibility that the same thing could happen in a national election. Like maybe in 2020?
LikeLiked by 1 person
OK, how about a hypothetical.
Say a governor’s race is won by Candidate A by 1000 votes. But then it is discovered that 5000 votes were cast by people who are dead, have moved away, or otherwise certify that they did not vote.
There is no way to determine for which candidate the 5000 fraudulent votes were cast. There is no way to determine if Candidate A really won.
What is the right thing to do?
Hold a new election?
Determine who cast the fraudulent votes and which party he favors?
Who does the investigation? The legislature? That appears to be Kentucky’s solution. Is there a better one?
LikeLike
Are there credible reports of 5,000 dead people voting in the very real situation we’re talking about?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Do you understand what a hypothetical is?
The point it to look at the issue as a matter of principle, divorced from the particular case at hand. The question is how to handle such a case fairly.
LikeLike
I do. I also understand what a straw man is.
You’re just saying, “well, if something completely different happened, it would be correct for the legislature to overturn the election.”
That said, hypothetically, toss out the offending ballots and let the chips fall where they may.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which ones are they? You only know that dead or absent people voted, you don’t know who they voted for.
LikeLike
You consult the gubernatorial ouija board. Obviously
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not sure if this exchange is tongue in cheek, but funny regardless…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Get over it. Your man Trump was repudiated at the polls. And deservedly so.
Kentucky is particularly satisfying for Democrats because Trump and the GOP did their level best to make the vote in that state about the looming impeachment. Sweet.
Turnout in Kentucky was over 42% compared to 31% in the previous gubernatorial election that put Bevin in office. THAT is the Trump effect and it is not good for the GOP anywhere. They survive on apathy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Except for the unpopular governor’s race, the election was a sweep for the GOP, winning all the other statewide races, That is hardly a repudiation of Trump of the GOP in general.
LikeLike
Silly rabbit. Trump carried Kentucky by 30 points. It is a long time very red, very backward state. But, thanks to Trump it now has a Democratic governor. Yes, Bevin was unpopular – too damn close and too similar to Trump.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hold a new election. That is what N.C. did after the discovery of a Republican operative falsifying absentee ballots in the 2018 election.
If you don’t do that, you are invalidating the other million plus votes.
Apparently, KY doesn’t have an automatic recount law. So it might be that the losing party has to pay and that could be the strategy of Bevin to avoid the cost.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, at least you know how to respond to a hypothetical.
Yes, holding a new election is one way. The problem there is that once it is known a race is that close, turnout will be different than the first time. But still it is an acceptable choice.
KY apparently allows the legislature to try to determine who cheated and correct the misdeed. That assumes they will proceed in a non-partisan manner. But it is also acceptable if done correctly.
I’m really not sure which I prefer, but KY made their choice prior to knowing who would be involved.
LikeLike
“That assumes they will proceed in a non-partisan manner” Not a safe assumption by any means in this day and age.
It is my understanding that Bevins was pretty unpopular even within the KY GOP ranks. That being said, the party in power doesn’t want to give it up so they will protect the Party over the state (or Country). The Senate and House GOP members prove that daily.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FWIW, I doubt Bevins has anything legit.
It would not make sense for someone to cheat on the governor’s race and not on the other statewide offices the GOP swept.
LikeLiked by 2 people